rights of minorities
A guide for human rights activists and civil society organizations
The perception of minority towards Somaliland.The minority tribes have played a vital role in Somalia.
Child Support Grants prove critical to reducing child poverty in South Africa.Positive impact...
Zakhe, 28, lives in Soweto in Johannesburg. She is a lesbian and a victim of a horrifying growing trend in South Africa: corrective rape. “They tell me that they will kill me, they will rape me and after raping me, I will become a girl,” she tells ActionAid. “I will become a straight girl.”
On a Sunday morning in July 2007, the bodies of Zakhe’s friends Sizakele Sigasa and Salome Masooa were found in a field in Meadowlands, a suburb of Johannesburg. Both women had been bound with their underwear, gang-raped, tortured and shot. Just weeks previously, Sizakele had said she felt uneasy in her community as one of the first women to live openly as a lesbian. Nearly eight years on, three men have been detained and released. The case is now effectively closed.
A man lies in the street after he was reportedly stabbed by a mob in Alexandra Township, Johannesburg, South Africa last month. The man, believed to be a Mozambican national, was taken to hospital for treatment but reportedly later died of his injuries Photo: Kevin Sutherloand/EPA
A month on from the xenophobic attacks that rocked the country last month, South Africa continues to deal with a crisis that refuses to go away; hate crimes against lesbian women to “cure” them of their homosexuality. Since the term corrective rape was coined by charity workers over a decade ago, few national statistics on levels of violence against lesbians have been compiled. At least 32 women have been raped and murdered in the last 15 years – but underreporting means this is likely to be the tip of the iceberg. According to South African charity Luleki Sizwe, more than 10 women are raped or gang-raped weekly.
Societal attitudes need to shift
The country’s transition to democracy and its constitutional and human rights framework has been a source of hope for South Africans. But as promise is translated into reality, South Africa is facing a number of challenges – one of which is the prevalence of gender-based violence.
South Africa has one of the highest rates of rape in the world. Of the estimated 500,000 rapes that take place every year, only one in nine are reported. For every 25 men brought to trial for rape, 24 will walk free – a poignant reminder of the aggressive masculinity that colours the social and political landscape of South Africa. In a country strongly influenced by traditional cultures and religious groups, corrective rape is a reaction to protect the status quo – women are forced to conform to gender stereotypes or suffer the consequences.
“There is a clear sense of entitlement to women’s bodies which underlies the general rape pandemic, and no doubt the attack of lesbian women or women who read as gender non-conforming,” says Emily Craven, policy and programme manager at ActionAid South Africa, one of the first charities to document the use of corrective rape.
“The notion that women do not need men for either economic support or sexual pleasure is one that is deeply threatening to entrenched patriarchal values.”
Several studies have highlighted the problem of gender inequality that pervades South Africa. According to research by the anti-violence NGO, CIET, 20 per cent of men said the victim “asked for it”. In a related survey, a quarter of Soweto schoolboys described “jackrolling” – a local term for gang rape – as “fun”. Survivors of corrective rape have said their attackers wanted to show them “how to be real women and what a real man tasted like”.
With the apartheid in recent memory, its scars are evident in the gendered and racial segregation of the country. Violence is rife and there is a clear hierarchy which places women and lesbians – often in depressed socio-economic circumstances – at the bottom.
Sex education is non-existent
Part of the problem is that the cycle of hostility towards women and homosexuality is not addressed. South African schoolchildren are not taught about sexuality, sexual or reproductive health – a vital factor in changing attitudes towards sexual violence. In 2013, a UNESCO report found that schools nationwide were failing to make the grade on a number of essential topics, including gender rights.
Significantly, still, brutal violence against gay women stands in stark contradiction to the country’s progressive 1996 constitution. As the first in the world to outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation – South Africa was the first country in Africa to recognise same-sex marriage – the post-apartheid constitution hailed a new era of tolerance and equality.
Yet even a new constitution has failed to abolish deep-rooted bias against the South African LGBTQ community. If anything, the formal protections intensified homophobic inclinations, as the legal framework sprinted ahead of social consciousness on the issue of gay rights.
“Homophobic violence is not unique to South Africa nor is it an African phenomenon – but it is clear that this violence has taken a particular form in South Africa,” Craven says. “In the post-apartheid era a series of key legal battles were won which entrenched gay rights, culminating in the legalisation of gay marriage in 2007. These battles were however largely fought in court rooms and little was done to try and bring the population along with the process.”
As LGBTQ issues began to feature prominently in local media, lesbian and gay men and women felt safe to come out. Yet the vast majority of the population remained openly homophobic, which led to a backlash. Recent studies show that homophobia is still a major problem – a 2013 study by the Pew Research Center found up to 61 per cent of South Africans believe society should not accept homosexuality.
The majority of attacks on lesbian women go unreported, but many are exceptionally violent – proof that attitudes towards lesbians are yet to change. Last August, 18-year-old Gift Makau was gang-raped, strangled with wire and left with a hosepipe in her mouth. Another woman, Noxolo Nogwaza was raped and stabbed to death with a shard of glass in 2011.
A failing criminal justice system
South Africa’s criminal justice system has failed to keep up with the country’s liberal constitution. Hate crimes on the basis of sexual orientation are still not recognised by South African law, and the courts refuse to recognise that it plays any part in cases of corrective rape. The police are reluctant to investigate hate crimes against lesbian women and there is little support for survivors.
Nomawabo, from the northernmost province of Limpopo, has been sexually assaulted twice. At the age of 15, she was raped by a schoolfriend and two years later, she was abducted by a group of men and sexually assaulted for three days. Despite these horrific attacks, she is one of the luckier victims: she survived. Yet despite reporting the crime to police, the case disappeared and her attackers were never caught.
“At school I was betrayed by my best friend. He told me to come to his house for a school assignment but when I got to the house we fought until he hit me so hard I collapsed, and then he raped me because he said I needed to stop being a lesbian,” Nomawabo told ActionAid.
“Afterwards I got pregnant and had a baby. The second time, my soccer friends and I were kidnapped at gunpoint and they took us somewhere far away and did what they wanted with us for three days. We told the police but the case just disappeared. Nothing happened because they all thought I deserved it.”
Up to 40 per cent of South African women will be raped in their lifetime according to the South African Institute of Race Relations, but estimates very widely due to underreporting. Further statistics from the South African Police Service state that between 2013 and 2014 there were a total of 46,253 rapes were reported to police countrywide. However, due to underreporting, the figure is likely to be much higher per year. The Medical Research Council estimate that only one in nine rapes are reported to the police.
Moreover, only 14 per cent of perpetrators are convicted. Such a lack of accountability has left report rates at an all-time low, partly attributed to the public perception of the police post-apartheid as a symbol of oppression. Until 1994, South Africans lived in fear of the state – unjust laws were applied unfairly, intended to entrench white domination.
The successful prosecution of rapes is a challenge most countries face – including the UK. Recent research by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary also showed less than a quarter of rapes reported to the police in England and Wales resulted in a charge.
However, reporting rates are starting improve in the UK, just as South Africa heads in the opposite direction.
Despite the modern constitution, South African legislation continues to discriminate against women. Under the “cautionary rule”, a judge must show awareness to special dangers on relying on uncorroborated evidence of a complainant – thus, victims of sexual violence feel they may be deemed untrustworthy. Most victims have little faith in the police and the courts to bring their attacker to justice.
“Survivors do not have faith in the criminal justice system, perhaps rightly so,” Sarah McLaughlin of Rape Crisis South Africa says. “This means that rapists are not held accountable; there is no deterrent to rape. In addition, our government does not prioritise the issue of gender violence and does not allocate sufficient resources to address this issue.”
After over 20 years of democracy, lesbians are still living in the shadow of the apartheid. Corrective rape is a symptom of the toxic gender inequality and homophobic attitudes that continue to plague the country – a seemingly endless cycle of violence that did not end with decades of segregation.
“Many of the factors that drive the violence against women are a result of South Africa’s history – such as access to safety, livelihoods and justice,” McLaughlin explains. “Violence against women comes part of the parcel of mass social and structural inequality left over from apartheid.”
Lydia Smith is a freelance journalist based in London. She has written for various national newspapers and magazines with a focus on human rights.
Whites in South Africa need to be very afraid.
Another 30 years of acceptance of their serfdom, under a pagan marxist government is being planned, by the likes of trade unions and several of their artist cohorts and psychological warfare specialists of the underground communist movement in South Africa.
The white resistance to a new wave of ‘Rainbow Nation’ propaganda is being eroded right now by the a coalition of criminal marxist cohorts.
It seems they still don’t get it, do they?
I am talking about everyone involved in South African politics. Be it a politician, an artist, civil rights movements, research institutes, journalists, the public, and the activists on the social media, especially facebook. The rest of the social media avenues are being poorly utilized by white South Africans.
And it is normal. Politics are not the interest of everyone. Just as the fishing sport ‘could be done by drinking at home’, there are quirks abound for everything that does not interest a person.
Apathy is veiled and disguised in many forms as well.
As many activist, and wannabe-activists there are, just many exist without a grasp for the truth.
Half truths, lies, political agendas, career considerations, political correctness, cultural marxism seems to dominate the field of public opinions about the politics of the day.
The fact of the matter is that should anything else than the truth dominate an opinion, it is an opinion in service of the lie and a sure-sign of a person with the spirit of the antichrist. Yes.
Serving a lie, serves Satan.
Spreading half truths is the character of a person with the spirit of the anti-christ.
There is no middle road.
Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the Truth, The Way and the Eternal Life.
Serving the lie, simply serves Satan and not Christ.
That is the point.
Why does so few have the truth in them?
I suppose they don’t have Christ in them.
The question is why do so many people hang on to lips of those spreading and bearing half truths, like the concubines of Satan?
The fact is people have not learned to discern the truth from the lie. They have not accepted Christ as their one and only Master, whom they do not seek to please wholeheartedly.
I will not differ from this opinion.
The fact is: how can you have any true opinion, be it in parliament, on stage, in the media, in newspapers, in think-tanks, and in civil organizations and trade unions if you deny Christ in your writings, sayings, quirks, essays, by spreading lies and half truths?
It is simply not possible.
The fact is that in a police state like South Africa, similar to Eastern Germany and the Soviet-Russia, the mass-media is in the hands of the communists. No dissenting voice is aired on those channels.
The other radio and television stations are willing servants of the impossible lie of the ‘Rainbow Nation’; -that brilliant piece of propaganda that was aired in the 1994 –euphorian era by the moles of the communist machine that permeated every level of the ‘white’ society in South Africa.
There are massive amounts of money, effort and human capital being spent at this precise moment, to increase the lifespan of the ‘Rainbow Nation’, most notably from large trade unions.
Whilst a new form of ‘Codesa’ and ‘self-determination’ is being designed to fill the minds of the whites of South Africa for the next 30 years, the failed state of South Africa being ignored.
In Soviet Russia, new ideas, new plans, new buildings and the like was designed to last 5 years, to satisfy the population that ‘something’ was being done to alleviate the suffering, and to more importantly, avoid the revolution of the masses, storming an infertile and incompetent government.
The brainwashing of South Africa is so complete and so perfect, that the idealists are planning their brainwashing campaigns 30 years ahead at this stage.
The apathy and general lack of information amongst whites are so complete, that even after South Africa was taken over by a master ploy of international communists, the whites still have to realize that individual journalists and ‘academics’, are the main political commissars of the current underground Marxist movement in South Africa.
They are the main propaganda and psychological warfare specialists that must ensure that the plot of the International Comintern, hatched in 1928, to create a black communist South Africa, is completed, thereby erecting a new East Germany in South Africa. This goal was reaffirmed in Cuba, Havana, during the 7th International Congress of the South African Communist Party in 1989.
Nobody should ever second-guess the true intentions of these covert marxist ideologues. They will not cease operations until every available of resource, be it capital, land, buildings, farmland and production means does not firmly belong to black South Africans, in particular ‘comrades’.
They will ceaselessly work until such time that every talent and gift of the Protestant whites are destroyed and rendered inoperable.
The word ‘apartheid’ was a mere propaganda invention to hide the real goals of the international communists. “Apartheid’ is an ‘Albatross’ propaganda technique, which once hung around someone’s neck, they struggle to get rid of this stinking bird, without success. ‘Apartheid’ was the most successful marxist propaganda technique ever invented, and will never be equalled.
Yet that single technique and word enslaves millions today, without them even being aware of it.
This is the same with the elite whites in South African communities. The elite hold memorial days, speeches, whilst others hold ‘crisis talks’ from airconditioned offices, as part of daily, and paid jobs..
Yet no mention of more than a million possible leaders killed by means of legal abortion since 1994? And who knows how many illegal abortions took place since 1994.
No mention of that in populist rallies and meetings, and so called ‘protests’.
Aborted babies can’t cheer them on.
First of all, elite protestors are all from the affluent side of society. The rest cant get there or have no insurance for their marauding thieves of motor cars in city centres.
Very few of these elites suffer from the consequences of the genocidal and racist; and apartheid Affirmative Action laws in South Africa.
On the very same day that memorial services are hold by the few for the victims of the ANC’s terror bombs, unquailified technicians working for a company, that was fraudulently awarded Metro Power contracts in Gauteng, illegally cut of the power to the homes of white residents, whose electrical accounts are in dispute, or in an estate, or just illegally billed due to a multitude of factors. These ‘contractors’ are escorted by the Police State’s force multipliers, the Metro Police, to ensure that the illegal activities are successfully carried out by the illiterate and criminal ‘contractors’. It is one criminal act upon another, upon another that prevails in government today, including the municipalities and huge metro municipalities.
The Metro Police accompanies criminals to ENSURE that the law is broken, just to penalize and punish the white residents in South Africa.
This happens in full view of white child drug-addicts, and their colored and Nigerian drug suppliers. The fact that South Africa is the largest host of transnational crime syndicates that exist because of collusion with South African government and police officials, simply seems to go by these activists amongst whites in every sphere of society.
The fact that drug addictions is the highest ever amongst all population groups, ever, in South African history, is simply not noticed by anyone.
The fact that the youth of Soweto is addicted to heroin, is simply ignored by all. Euphemistically it is called Nyoba. But it is heroin, and supplied by Nigerian drug dealers. This was the basis of recent riots and unrest in Soweto- a drug crazed youth who would not be confined to the boundaries of Soweto, but will soon prowl the streets of South Africa, like the ‘jeunesse’ in Africa.
The ‘jeunesse’ was a drug crazed youth militia, influenced by witchdoctors, and provided with paraphernalia and fetishes to do with water, which supposedly made them immune to bullets from soldiers, police or ‘enemy bullets’. Therefore a lot of them wore bath chains, hosepipes, and water taps around their necks as ‘protection’.
The ‘jeunesse’ of Soweto is probably already operating in a place near you, for the moment content with stealing your pallisade-fences or metal post boxes. But soon, they will bear arms and come and take your more important material belongings.
South Africa exports the most cocaine and heroin in the world and supply the most of the cannabis needs of ‘Great Britain’.
This is the result of all the international mafia groups, Triad groups and transnational crime syndicates operating freely in South Africa, in and around your very hometown and dwelling. The head of the Chinese abalone smuggling syndicate and Triad group, resides in Dainfern, in and around the home of Dr Dan Roodt. This Chinese crime-boss is always released within an hour of being arrested. Anybody cares to guess why and how?
Transkei, Zululand, Lesotho and Swaziland produces in the region of 108 000 tons of cannabis; EACH; – yearly. This has led farmers to focus on producing cannabis, and neglect the farming of vegetables, resulting in begging South Africa for food, like in the case of Lesotho. The price that cannabis fetches on the markets are five times that of any vegetable.
The cannabis trade also provides a multitude of growers with an income, without which the socio-economic situation in South Africa would reach unmanageable crisis proportions, and heighten the revolutionary potential significantly.
The drug trade stimulates mini economies in suburbs, especially in places like Turffontein, Yeoville, and Rocky street. For this reason as well, government officials leaves them alone.
The other fact is police officers openly collect their ransom or ‘dues’ from the drug dealers in these areas. Sunnyside in Pretoria and the inner city of Pretoria is rife with these transactions between police and drug dealers, which also entails prostitution rings, in many cases within walking distance from the head office of the SAPS in Wachthuis in Pretoria.
The electricity problem in South Africa is not going away, and will never go away again.
It is the clearest and darkest of all indicators that South Africa is the last failed state in Africa. Fifty years after independence, Africa is a failed continent. Without fail, no African country succeeded to manage themselves into a succesful country.
The two exceptions were Botswana and South Africa. But South Africa benefited from the bridal gifts endowed to them by the white rulers in 1994. And those benefits are now gone.
And as a result South Africa has joined as the latest of failed states in Africa.
Whilst everyone blames Eskom for the current power predicament, nobody seems to realize, that it was a collusion of several role players, all linked to the communist party, that individually and together, that prevented the erection of new power supplying facilities in South Africa.
NERSA, Earthlife Africa (an affiliate of the internation Green Peace communist movement); the ANC, and Eskom, were all guilty of preventing the erection of new power generation capabilities in South Africa.
Those facts were presented to NERSA’s public hearings several years ago by the Freedom Front’s Advocate Anton Alberts.
The fact of the matter is that whites should consider if they have an ear for the truth is that light and power of South Africa will go off, permanently in some cases. In most cases it will only go off in white areas to punish the unwanted culture groups of the whites, mainly because of their dissenting but educated opinions. Mainly it will go off because whites are the bearers of all evil, according to the dominating Cultural Marxist ideologies with which the ANC, Black Nationalists and Communists govern South Africa.
In Zimbabwe, the power is in switched on in Harare, the home of Mugabe and his Mashona people. The power is off in Bulawayo, the home of the opposing Matabele tribe and home of the current MDC political movement.
The communists that govern South Africa, is following a resource-based, Africa-style form of government. Followers of the ruling party is set up on land that contains resources, be it mineral, precious stones, timber, farms food, or easy-plundered white suburbs. In Africa, the followers of ruling parties are set up on top of gold deposits, diamond fields, game reserves, or deposits of rare-earth metals needed in modern economies, like Coltan in the Congo, which is needed to manufacture modern flat screen television sets, laptop computers, android phones and smart phones. And South Africa is well endowed with rare earth metals, which will become the killing fields of tomorrow.
And according to plan it will become the home of many Africans allowed on top of the minerals, which they will mine themselves, without the need for a government provided job. This will satisfy both the voter/supporter and the ruling party.
Once the ANC got rid of all the white farmers in South Africa, will the REAL PLUNDER begin. Mineral wealth under the soil will be home as well as the workplace for slaves digging for a little bit of wealth.
Look at the efforts of the illegal Xama-Xamas or illegal gold diggers in South Africa, and you will understand South Africa is earmarked to become one huge pox mark on the continent, almost like watching the moon from a distance.
The mineral wealth in South Africa is distributed country-wide, even up to the West Coast with it’s rare earth metals, and the Norhern Cape with its deposits of rare earth metals.
There is no escape from this reality.
Mad Max the movie, with its mindless violence in a waterless country is what awaits South Africa.
That is the reality around which celebrities, and political activists should rally if they are sincere, and not just seeking a bit of fame or political economy, with their lying actions.
The truth is once the lights go off permanently for South Africa, and the real civil war, and terror campaigns of the cannibal-warlords begin, none of the elite white so-called will be in South Africa anymore. And none of the ruling party members of the ANC or the communist party. By then they would have all abandoned ship under a thinly veiled excuse.
It would be the only the black masses, illegal immigrants and white middle class left to fight a civil war similar to the hunger games, in which there will be a large scale carnage and destruction, famine and prevalent thirst.
This is why the Kruger National Park will cease to exist. At present it is allowed to being plundered from all sides by Marxist governments, including Mozambique and South Africa. It contains value for their supporters in the form of rhino horn and elephant ivory. It will be plundered until the last one of the Big 5 is killed. Thereafter the park will cease to exist and stop attracting tourists.
ONLY THEN will the real and intended plunder begin of the Kruger National Park.
The Kruger National Park is well endowed with gold deposits right through from Malelane, Pilgrims Rest, Nelspruit up to the border with Zimbabwe.
The map of gold deposits in the Kruger Park, perfectly explains to you why every bit of plunder is allowed to happen.
The gold deposits and the mining thereof by illiterate pagan African hordes, tells you where we are headed.
After all farmlands have been put in possession of ‘comrades’ the cultivation of cannabis and other drugs will begin in earnest, as well as the mining of diamonds, gemstones and other rare-earth metals.
This is the map indicating the presence of diamonds in South Africa, of which poverty stricken Africans are eagerly waiting to grab their share. No farm will be spared.
The very same expulsion and murders of whites will occur in areas that contain the rare-earth metals, on which a multitude international economies are based.
These maps show you why white lives don’t matter, and why the BIG 5 don’t matter. Not now, not yesterday, and not tomorrow.
In this resource based form of governance, electricity will only be supplied to those that support the government.
Fresh water resources in South Africa is also depleted due to mismanagement by government. The Lesotho Highlands water projects is supplying South Africa with fresh water.
But even that fresh water supply has been depleted.
The ‘government’ is now looking at phase 2 of the Lesotho Highlands water project so supply South Africa with fresh water. But looking at the track record of the ANC government the past 21 years and the damage it has done, I personally cannot see the situation being rectified in the next fifty years, even if they start immediately today.
The intellectual brain drain and sabotage of the education system that was started in 1996 by the then Kader Asmal, has sabotaged any hope of an economic take-off by South Africa. Kader Asmal closed all education colleges throughout South Africa, effectively destroying any hope of the production of scientists and engineers that can stimulate economic growth, build water-infrastructure, or maintain the aging, overused system inherited in 1994. Fixing the education system and erecting of education colleges that can produce quality teachers, that can produce engineers that can become professors, that can train an army of water producing engineers, will take at least fifty years.
That is not going to happen.
The lack of fresh water will ultimately destroy South Africa.
There are water producing technologies available that harvest the atmosphere. But the larger they get the more electricity they need. And the smaller solar driven ones will barely meet the fresh water needs of one family.
So all in all, no water and no power will lead to famine. You simply won’t be able to keep your vegetables and protein frozen.
And so you won’t be able sustain yourself, unless you eat biltong every day.
So, in my mind, unless you are addressing the plundering of innocent, jobless, poor whites by municipalities and government alike, you are merely portraying tokenism towards the plight of the Afrikaners and other poor whites.
Unless you are addressing the oppressive police state and it’s force multipliers that busy with a systemic mass-slaughter of the unwanted white race group in South Africa, in the modern era, with several force multipliers, like a well developed road system, army, broadcasting facilities, genocidal workplace laws, you are also merely guilty of tokenism and a willing participant in the systemic slaughter of whites in South Africa.
If you are still using the words “genocide of whites’, ‘plaasmoorde’, ‘farm-killings’ , ‘farm murders’, ‘ordinary crime’ and the like; you are an accomplice with evil. You are unwittingly a part of the psychological warfare team of Max du Preez, and Piet Croucamp, because you are denying the truth, and spreading the lies in the hope that your own wealth, pension funds, singing career, or plush life in a wealthy estate does not crumble before you die.
Only 6% of whites die in farm murders.
88 % of whites are murdered in town and cities.
6% of the whites murdered are females.
More brutal is the fact that regardless the number of whites killed in the systemic mass-slaughter of whites in South Africa, TWICE as many young white men commit suicide due to the effects of the genocidal BEE laws and the after effects like divorce.
Even more brutal than this is the fact that close to million legal abortions was carried out on feature leaders since 1994, and the number of future leaders murdered in illegal abortions in unknown in South Africa.
So rather crying genocide, rather cry : ‘SYSTEMIC MASS SLAUGHTER OF WHITES IN SOUTH AFRICA, BY A BRUTAL COMMUNIST REGIME.”
Their killing fields is not limited to farm murders, genocides in the cities and the like, but is carried on ruthlessly in abortion clinics throughout the country, situated in modern hospitals like the Flora Clinic; for instance the ANNE STOPES CLINICS, in South Africa.
The systemic mass slaughter of whites in South Africa is terminology that each and every one should get used to and spread the word and concept.
The brutal tortures and mutilations that accompany and precede ONLY the murder of whites, and is carried out by ONLY BLACKS, do occur only in genocides, wars, and the SYSTEMIC MASS SLAUGHTERS OF UNWANTED POPULATION GROUPS IN THE MODERN ERA.
Whites in South Africa are caught up in something far worse than a genocide.
Whites in South Africa are caught up in something far worse than a war.
Whites in South Africa are caught up in the systemic mass slaughter with the use of several force multipliers in a modern era, in an effort to rid South Africa from the unwanted and ‘evil whites’
And this is where many don’t get it.
This is the point where the multitude of men, crucify Christ once more.
This is where the multitude crucify Christ again, because they deny the truth.
Spreading the lies, is denying Christ; and crucifying HIM once more.
Christ is the truth. Not speaking the truth, is denying Christ, and nailing Christ to the cross once more.
Spreading the lies because it carries with it some political economy, and political expediency, is crucifying Christ again.
Spreading the lies and denying the truth, is crucifying Christ once more.
Falsifying history, and applying the illegal, criminal, and immoral revisionism of history, so that it portrays a criminal and terrorist history based on marxist principles is an action that qualifies you to viewed only as a person with the spirit of the antichrist.
Falsifying history of South Africa, and replacing it with a terrorist history, named “The Turning Points in History”; like the ANC did, is nothing else but the work of the antichrist in action, denying the truth, and crucifying Christ.
And this is where the majority of commentators, activists, organizations, NGO’s, unions miss the point.
Speaking half a truth, is worse than a lie.
Speaking of farm murders only whilst the majority is carried out in cities, is a lie.
Spreading only a half-baked truth, or only part of it, or not mentioning another simply makes you an accomplice with evil, and the Satan.
And the antichrist is not the number 666, or a person like Gorbachef, with a birth scar on his head.
The antichrist is each and every person that speaks half truths, half lies, denying truths, inventing new lies to make it more acceptable for their company. The antichrist also invent new lies to fit company goals like the recent adventure of Carte Blanche’s farm tours, that concluded that farm murders is not politically oriented.
This was one of the worst cases of the antichrist in action in South Africa, as it originated from within the Afrikaner community, like a Trojan Horse with the sole purpose of re-erecting the spirit of betrayal of whites once again, like the Codesa betrayal and the period of ‘negotiations with the ANC, that should have led to a non-discriminatory ‘NEW SOUTH AFRICA’, but which turned out to be the largest collection of hell bound policies that exist outside of hell itself.
Somewhere, some elder farmer and his wife watched Carte Blanche declare nonchalantly that there is no black genocide against whites unfolding in South Africa, after they very academically visited one farm only.
That old farmer or his wife will then based on this mindless utterance from Carte Blanche, open their farmdoor for the next black unknown, ‘buyer of a sheep, or of milk’.
And once their brains is splattered on the farm floor, like those of Willemientjie Potgieter, by black terrorists, whose intentions was stated clearly in court documents, ‘to attack the white people’; the producers of Carte Blanche and their co-workers, will then nonchalantly again state, it was ‘normal crime’.
The black terrorists that murdered Willemientjie and her parents, clearly stated in court documents: ‘that their sole aim was to attack the WHITE PEOPLE.
Never since Jan Smuts nonchalantly declared the atrocities documented in the Havenga collection, that the genocide by means of rape and sex camp for Boer females aged 10 years and older, as ‘of non-interest to the general public’ in order to expedite his efforts of ‘nation-building’ with the raping British and their colored and African cohorts, -have whites witnessed such a betrayal from within, as that exhibited by the whole Carte Blanche program. Except of course that of the National Party and the Broederbond moles of communism.
Jan Smuts declared the genocidal rapes of whites a secret and for 87 years up until 1987, was kept secret by successive governments. Only then was the documents of Havenga made public to bona-fide researchers.
That year of course saw the illegitimate start of non-sanctioned ‘negotiations’ with the ANC in Dakar, rather read (the carrying over of power to a communist regime).
This is firstly a message for the churches of South Africa, as well as for all their representatives, ministers, pastors, and dominees.
Above is the truth that should firstly spoken from the pulpit. Denying the truths of everyday life, the government and the real history, (not the communist one) is denying Christ and crucifying Him again once more.
Not knowing the facts about everyday life, crime syndicates, the real history, the lies about the ‘apartheid’ communist propaganda is no excuse. Get educated quickly.
If you a church-goer, but deny the above facts; -stop and rather go for a beer on Sundays. You are wasting your time, as well as everyone else’s in church. You don’t impress God, by denying the truth and crucifying Christ Sunday after Sunday.
If you have a problem with alcohol abuse, or substance abuse, and deny it to yourself, stop searching for the antichrist in the book of Revelations. Rather use a mirror, and you will have instantaneous results. Guaranteed.
If you are an adulterer, and deny it, know that the spirit of the antichrist is contained in 3 characters. It is NOT 666, but is spelt YOU.
If you love the things of God more than the God of things, know you are serving Mammon, and not the living Christ.
If you keep on telling yourself you really need the top range of your current choice of vehicles, and you cannot downgrade just one level, and giving the savings to the church for welfare work, don’t bother. Your lies to yourself don’t stick in heaven as well.
The truth is to be vocalized in every facet of everyday life. Otherwise we are leading the lives of the antichrist.
The truth is to be lived within oneself, and outside of oneself in this world.
We can have a Roman Catholic perspective on all humans, namely that they are capable of paying for their salvation and all people were meant to accept Christ, or we can have the perspective of Jesus’ disciples, accepting after three days of preaching at one place that the multitudes were simply not meant for the gospel or for heaven.
Simple. Or we can keep on hoping like the colonialist ‘missionaries’ that somehow the relationship with the pagans will become profitable in one way or another?
Or we can have a Protestant perspective, that some humans originated from the workings of Satan, specifically in the parables of the good seed and the bad seed.
The Bible tells us that many humans are weed, created specifically for the day of judgment.
Furthermore do we need to accept that the Middle Eastern Arab believed in Christ for almost 600 years, before they rejected Him, and accepted the Muslim faith. They were witness to His miracles and His completed works of faith on earth.
So were the Africans present in the Middle East as slaves. They were witness to the works, teaching and miracles of Christ. Yet up until today, we regard them as possible grounds for evangelism? After 2000 years?
The disciples spread the gospel and people accepted the gospel within 3 sermons. Why change?
Is it not time to accept the multitude of black South Africans that deliberately vote for an antichristian marxist regime are antichrist-like personas as well?
You simply cannot support and vote for the antichrist, and them claim to be civil, cultured and Christian-like as well.
You cannot live a lie, and claim to believe in the truth.
We as whites should start viewing the black masses as our true enemy, in person and in faith.
Perhaps Jan van Riebeeck was us centuries ahead with his observations written down in his journals?
On the 7th of February 1654, Jan van Riebeeck notes in his diary: “We will never be able to trade peacefully with the naturels, which is an uncultivate bunch. They want nothing but to steal and plunder all that they can, without ever departing with one sheep or cow. Only the sick, lame and cripple animals are traded, despite the fact that they have the best of everything.”
On the 10th of February 1655, Jan van Riebeeck notices in his journal: “It is clear for the Dutchmen, the friendler you are towards the blacks, the more arrogant they get, as well as more challenging and brave.”
Their dealings were with the Strandlopers and Hottentot solely at that stage, as it was the only groups they encountered in the beginning stages of the Cape.
The brutal British genocidaires, the first of 20th century, knew in their so-called ‘evangelization processes’ in South Africa, that the Africans were never to be evangelized. Their whole farcical evangelization process is summed up by the British colonial administrator in South Africa, sir Harry Johnstone’s words. About British colonialists and evangelical mission stations he said the following:
‘As their immediate object is not profit, they can afford to reside at places till they become profitable. They strengthen our hold over the country, they spread the use of the English language, they induct the natives into the best of civilization, and in fact each mission is an essay in colonization.’
Music is not one of my talents.
But I hear a song from way back refraining in my head; “They shoot horses…..♫….♪..don’t they?….♫♪….”
I hear another line added to that song…..
“They still don’t get it, do they? …..♪♫….”
Who and what are the Afrikaners?
For more than 200 years, Afrikaners have been the victims in all aspects of the ‘liberal’ and International onslaught against their psyches, country, property and other fields.
By not having access to reality, and the real history, as well as media controlled by the enemies of Afrikaners, Afrikaners became permanent slaves and ‘black sheep’ of powerful enemies.
An unknown writer has this to say:
To reach a valid historical perspective of the human relations pattern in present-day South Africa, one has to go back to the days of Columbus, close to five centuries ago.
In the 14th century, five years before Columbus set out on his trans-Atlantic voyage which resulted in the discovery of America, the Portuguese navigator, Batholomew Diaz, reached the southern-most part of Africa. Here, in 1652 at the Cape of Good Hope, halfway between Europe and the East, the Dutch East India Company established a victualing station for passing East India men. The Dutch intended the station to be self-supporting, but this soon proved to be impracticable without allowing officials to settle as “free burghers”. In 1657, the first free burghers were permitted to become private farmers, and in this way the foundations of a new nation in Africa were laid. The ranks of the original free men were subsequently strengthened by the people of Dutch, German and French descent. The term “boer” (farmer) was elevated to the honorable concept of “Boer”, with a wider connotation, viz.pioneer and settler. “Boer” became synonymous with the appellation “Afrikaner”, a term used as early as 1706 to denote people who had their roots in the African soil. Their permanent links with Africa were emphasized by the spontaneous and natural way in which the various 17th century Dutch dialects evolved into a new tongue, Afrikaans.
The only indigenous peoples to come in contact with the Boer-Afrikaner community, were nomadic Bushmen and Hottentot tribes. In the case of the Hottentots, deculturisation and the ravages of a series smallpox epidemics led to the disintegration of the main tribes and their subsequent progressive involvement with Negro and East Indian slaves, as well as with sailors, soldiers and people of other races, in the crystallization of a new ethnic group, the Cape Coloureds. A further element was admixed with the Cape Coloured community upon the arrival of Bantu tribes.
The Bantu tribes, the forefathers of the majority of modern day black people in South Africa, are established mainly in the part of the continent south of the Sahara desert. Today many local Black sophisticates prefer to be called Africans, a misleading appellation considering that contemporary Africa is the mother continent of a large number of different ethnic, racial, linguistic and religious entities.
The first meetings between Afrikaner farmers, or Boers, and black tribes took place during 1750-1770 roughly where the Eastern Cape is today. For an entire century, unaware of the existence of black tribes, Afrikaner farmers, who have mostly already been born on African soil, expanded their settlement to over 170 000 square kilometers (more than twice the size of Austria) of desolated and unoccupied land. Only towards the end of the 16th century did the Afrikaner farmers increasingly come into contact with Black tribes. In the 1770’s, some what thousand kilometers to the north-east of Cape Town, the Afrikaner migratory stream came into substantial contact with the vanguard of another migratory movement, namely the Xhosa-speaking tribe. They were the advance guard of a Black migratory movement from the vicinity of the Great Lakes of Central Africa. It would appear that by the end of the 15th century these tribes had moved as far as present-day Zambia, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. They probably crossed into the present-day Republic of South Africa in appreciable numbers in the course of the 17th century – at about the same time as the Afrikaner free farmers’ settlement was expanding inland from the Cape of Good Hope.
The Black population movement into the area which later became known as British South Africa did not constitute a single coherent expansion. It took the form of successive waves of small tribes representing four different Black ethnic groups – Nguni, Sotho, Venda and Tsonga – responding to the push and pull of economic conditions and tribal conflicts. These migratory tribes simply moved to wherever nature offered most and enemies threatened least. Among these tribes the modern Western concept of a geo-politically defined country and land ownership was practically unknown. In the case of the white group this concept was strongly developed, and it was therefore quite natural for the Dutch Governor at the Cape to react to the White-Black contact situation by proclaiming in 1778 the Fish River as the official boundary between the two groups. This deliberate geographical demarcation, coupled with a recognition of the existence of specific Black territories, has remained the basis of the White-Black relationship pattern for many years.
After the Napoleonic Wars, the Cape of Good Hope was formally ceded to Britain. From 1806 on wards, relatively large numbers of English, Scottish and Irish settlers arrived at the Cape
The Boer-Afrikaner trekkers, increasingly dissatisfied with British colonial rule and with a growing sense of independence, decided to leave British jurisdiction. From 1835 onwards – at about the same time that the American pioneers undertook their famous westward trek – nearly a quarter of the Cape’s White population left the colony in a series of organized movements, collectively known as the Great Trek. The movement coursed over vast tracts of empty land. Areas that had been inhabited by migratory Bantu tribes had become depopulated as a result of the “Mfecane” (the “crushing”) – a series of Black, specifically Zulu, reigns of terror. For nearly a quarter of a century, there was an era of internecine warfare characterized by the most appalling bloodshed and devastation. The impis (regiments) of the Zulu king, Shaka, reigned supreme in Natal and even penetrated the Transvaal across the Drakensberg Mountains, leaving a trail of destruction, exterminating or dispersing all other tribes with which they came into contact. Shaka was not the only ruler responsible for this kind of destruction. Mzilikazi, one of his former lieutenants, broke away from the Zulu king and established a following of his own – the Matabele tribe.
The Afrikaner trekkers who moved into Natal encountered various Zulu tribes. In February 1838 Piet Retief, the leader of the trekkers, negotiated with Dingaan, the Zulu king and successor to Shaka, and obtained from him a document granting the trekkers “the place called Port Natal, together with all the land from the Tugela to the Umzimvubu rivers…”. Before Retief and his party could return to their people they were murdered in Dingaan’s kraal. The written contract, was however retrieved by the trekkers and still exists today.
In the light of this, the claim that the Afrikaner nation is a “settler nation” is unfounded and historically incorrect. Considering that the first Whites at the Cape arrived only 32 years after the Pilgrim Fathers set foot on American soil in 1620, it would be fallacious to label present-day White South African society as still a settler or immigrant community. In fact, there were stable White communities in the South African interior before the founding of most of the Latin American republics. The first West European arrivals at the Cape antedated the colonization of Australia (1788) and New Zealand (1790) by 136 and 138 years respectively. The white community was also economically settled on unoccupied or negotiated land before the most and major black tribes even crossed the modern day borders of South Africa. Coming closer to the present time, one cannot ignore the significance of the White South African nation’s role in the two world wars, amongst others as a founding member of the the League of Nations and the United Nations.
The white South African nation has been created by the historical forces of more than four centuries. Measured against all accepted historical and demographic criteria, this nation exists as an integral part of the African continent’s socio-political structure. Today, the Whites of the Republic of South Africa rightfully consider themselves a permanent established African nation, geo-politically rooted in a part of the continent which has in the course of more than four centuries become their only motherland.
For more than 200 years, Afrikaners have been the victims in all aspects of the ‘liberal’ and International onslaught against their psyches, country, property and other fields.
By not having access to reality, and the real history, as well as media controlled by the enemies of Afrikaners, Afrikaners became permanent slaves and ‘black sheep’ of powerful enemies.
That reality lasts up until the present day in 2015.
This essay is meant to free the entrapped psyches of the Afrikaner nation, and to provide Afrikaners with the powerful and secret history of their entrapment, and the lies kept in place with which an induced guilt-complex keeps Afrikaners from exerting a more meaningful contribution in their own lives, living conditions and living realities.
This essay will only briefly mention secrets surrounding the history of Afrikaners and South Africa in general. Although brief, this history is essential for any individual to have a meaningful opinion, or make a meaningful contribution in political debates in the current day about South Africa.
The social media has exploded recently with controversies surrounding perceptions and actions of well known South African artists, Steve Hofmeyr and Sunette Bridges.
The mistake of these artists: ? – they care for their own, they care for the civilization from which they originate, and they dare to voice an opinion different from the thought police of the liberals, and the atheïst marxists that rule South Africa.
The perversion that rules in South Africa, has created a crime-ridden, and slum-infested country which has been downgraded by international credit agencies, to the level of ‘trash’, and its education is at the bottom of the log, of 144 countries measured.
South Africa of 1994 has been transformed into Crimificent Dustbinia; like Monte Carlo; the place to plunder and play for liberals, marxists, atheïsts, pedophiles and perverts alike. That is why they defend their newly-found ‘pleasure-heaven’ so vehemently.
Above all, democracy is a mob rule, and the rule of the plunderers over the producers, favouring parasites to plunder wealth and food, that they have not produced. In essence it allows the rule of pagans and antichristians over the true children of God, -the owners of South Africa, the Afrikaner people.
This essay is meant to educate those that wish to participate in a meaningful way to the current political debate in South Africa.
It is also a very special education for those liberals and atheist- marxists that both rule South Africa, and who wish to stifle differing, informed opinions that are based on historical truths, rather than on emotions, psychological warfare, and illegal revisionisms of history, like the false ‘Turning Points in History” created by the communist Thabo Mbeki and his illiterate cohorts a while ago in the South African parliament.
South Africans are subjected daily to a dumbed-down level of political awareness and debates on all levels. Suffering from the liberal’s albatross psychological warfare techniques, the majority of South Africans are suffering from an amputation from political realities and a true sense of history, whilst whites are programmed to go through life with a permanent sense of guilt.
This dumbing-down by liberals are maintained by strongmen in the media, as well as liberal writers like Max du Preez, and other well-trained communist psyops-operators.
The fact is that most liberals are satanists in disguise. However to become a satanist, you must become anti-christ in nature, and to achieve this end, you must first become a liberal, that denies the existence of the variety of God’s creations on earth.
To the liberal, a criminal is a virtuous being, with no difference between a criminal and a classical violinist.
To the liberals, there is no difference a Chinese or African cannibal, or the conductor of a symphonic orchestra.
The liberals live a life of apathy in a world of ignorance. Obvious differences to them between different races, simply does not exist on earth.
In the mind of the liberals, simply being white constitutes a mental illness.
Voicing opinions and holding viewpoints other than that of the illiterate masses carries the risk of being labelled as suffering from ‘political and reformatory insanity’.
– “One of psychiatry’s leading figures, Richard von Krafft -Ebing, added to his list of varieties of mental disorders ‘political and reformatory insanity’—meaning any inclination to form a different opinion from that of the masses,” the trio of researchers stated.
For some reason the eyes of liberals have been scorched close, leaving them with no distinction between different realities and different kinds of men.
Suffering from minds colonized by a self-induced blindness, life is bliss, because ignorance is bliss for liberals.
From this blind perspective, the liberals wish to control those around them, that are open to the variety of God’s creations.
So what is the true, hidden and secret and quintessential history of South Africa and the Afrikaners in particular, that is avoided daily by the media, and it’s marxist-propagandists like Max du Preez and others?
The liberals constantly undermine the Afrikaners that are a civilized, and developed culture with an advanced of morals and dogma, that allowed them the highest ability a nation can exhibit: namely the creation of a nation-state, in the form of South Africa, at the Sandriver Convention in 1852.
The President of Russia, Mr Putin, recently identified the same threats as coming from the ‘West’, that pose a danger to the well-being of Russia. And his observations are just as valuable for Afrikaners in South Africa. Many of his observations are contained in a few sentences below and was adapted for the situation in South Africa today.
The excesses of liberals pose a danger to the continued existence of white Protestants in South Africa. These excesses include foreign policy, domestic policy, morals and other aspects.
Liberals deny their own roots, including their Christian roots, which form the basis of western civilization. These very Protestant roots established the modern science in all aspects of life as we know it today. And these very same Protestant roots established and created the modern day South Africa as we know it today. From a wilderness, the modern South Africa was carved by by the Afrikaners since 1652.
Today, the moral basis and any traditional identities, like national, religious, cultural and even gender identities are being denied and relativised.
Politics treat a family with many children as a homosexual relationship (juridically), and faith in God, the same as faith in Satan or the occult.
The excesses of Political Correctness promotes various forms of perversion in our society.
These excesses are not afraid to publicly promote and voice their absence of faith in the only Living God, Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
The deeper moral values of Christian celebrations are hidden and denied in this country.
The efforts of the liberals to force their points of view onto the masses, these efforts are nothing but the degradation and primitivization of the Protestant Afrikaners and society in general.
This has lead to a deepening moral and demographic crisis in South Africa, amongst whites, and the country in general.
What can be a better evidence of the moral crisis of a human society, than the loss of its reproductive function?
Without the moral values that are rooted in Christianity and other world religions, without rules and moral values which have been formed and developed over millenia, people will inevitably lose their human dignity and become brutes.
It is right and natural to defend and preserve these moral (Christian) values.
The rights of minorities and majorities must be respected.
In a unipolar South Africa, whites will have to surrender their own identity and their God-created diversity as well as their advanced levels of civilization, that was developed over millenia.
Important national decisions have to made on a collective level, and not in the interest of one party or one culture group alone.
Liberals hold the view that all men and races are equal, and those that differ from them, are labelled simply as racist. According to liberals, all men are equally intelligent, equally capable, and equally responsible.
It is actually quite the opposite.
To view all races as equal, and man as equal, is actually racist. The ‘equal’ perspective denies the god-given talents that are handed out to the few, and denies the superiority of some individuals compared to others.
In South Africa, the Afrikaners are constantly being accused as the designers of apartheid. That beautiful piece of stinking-albatross propaganda technique, maintains a stranglehold on the minds of Afrikaners, whilst in reality, all the apartheid laws was made and implemented by the British usurpers in South Africa.
There was no colonization. Afrikaner created the Afrikaner Republic at the Sandriver Convention in 1852 already. This consisted of the Transvaal and the Free State. The interior of South Africa, was emptied of Africans by Shaka in his brutal D’feqane, in which he decimated African tribes and sold them as slaves in Mozambique. Shakas actions was finished by 1820.
After gold and diamonds was discovered, the British, in a brutal rape-genocide, raped and killed Afrikaner females and daughters older than 10 in concentration camps, and
kept them in sex-camps. The British commandeered Africans from neighboring countries, and supplied them with 400 000 guns to help the British to illegally usurp the sovereign Afrikaner Republic of South Africa from 1898 to 1901, by which time, Afrikaners were the legal owner and rulers of a sovereign country for nearly 50 years.
The British genocide and rape campaign all over the concentration camps forced the Boers was forced to stop their resistance against these brutalities, from fear of losing a whole generation due to the rape campaign of the British, Africans and Coloureds.
Immediately after this, in 1902 Milner imposed a hut tax on all African in neigboring African countries on all young males, which could only be paid if they worked on the newly stolen gold mines. Many of them did not return to their home countries, and the Africans (illegally) increased in numbers in the interior in South Africa under the terrorist rule of the British that ruled South Africa up until 1961,and whom by the way implemented ALL the ‘apartheid laws in South Africa.
The British developed ‘apartheid’ laws, only AFTER South Africa, which became a sovereign and independent state in 1852, was raped into submission by usurping British and their black and colored cohorts. Females and daughters of 10 years and older was also put in sex-camps and used as sex slaves.
This gruesome history was censored for a century worldwide, and only made public once South Africa was well underway to being handed over on a silver platter to communists.
This atrocities took place despite Britain being a signatory to the Hague Convention. Talking about ‘apartheid’ laws whilst ignoring the true nature of how Britain came into a position in South Africa to make those laws, is in my mind the Lone Tree Propaganda Technique which focuses on apartheid, whilst ignoring the fact that the making of apartheid laws was done by Britain, and also ignoring the British and their cohort’s atrocities that preceded it. They turned the white population of South Africa, into permanent serfs of the British Royalty, even up until today, whilst continuing their plunders of our wealth. After subjecting the Afrikaners through their rape-campaigns, the British then set about importing Africans into the country, as mineworkers, to mine the newly acquired gold deposits and diamond mines. This importing of Africans into a sovereign country of whites then led to the growth and permanence of the African population in South Africa, which was previously depleted of Africans by Shaka’s decimation of other African tribes in South Africa, in a campaign known as the Dfeqane, or Mfeqane. And on the backs of this raped children and females in South Africa, the British Royal family, and the liberals in South Africa, have built their fantastic wealth, and continues to do so even today. THAT is the history that is so succintly left out in all this, ‘nice’ and ‘insightfull’ writings.
It is interesting to note that Cecil John Rhodes, a Committee of 300 member who fronted for the Rothschilds in South Africa followed the Inchcape pattern, bringing hundreds of thousand of Indian “coolies” to work on the sugar cane plantations in Natal province.
The Chamber of Mines founded the Witwatersrand Native Labour Association (WNLA) and the Native Recruiting Corporation in 1902 to acquire unskilled labour to work on the South African mines. TEBA was established in March 1977 as an amalgamation of Mine Labour Organization (NRC) Ltd. And Mine Labour Organizations (Wenela) Ltd. The history of TEBA’s involvement in the South African Mining industry is housed at the UJ.
The Employment Bureau of Africa Ltd. (TEBA) was established in March 1977 as an amalgamation of two companies, namely Mine Labour Organisations (NRC) Ltd. and Mine Labour Organisations (Wenela) Ltd. In 1902 the Witwatersrand Native Labour Association was established to recruit labour for the South African mines. They started by recruiting Mozambicans and later men north of latitude 22 degrees South (Tropic of Capricorn), including the Caprivi Strip, Angola, Zambia (then Northern Rhodesia) and Malawi (then Nyasaland). They even recruited miners from China. The Native Recruiting Corporation was established in 1912 to recruit mine labour south of 22 degrees South. They recruited labour from the former Ciskei and Transkei as well as Lesotho (formerly Basutoland), Botswana (was Bechuanaland), Swaziland and KwaZulu-Natal. In 1966 the NRC and WNLA changed their names to Mine Labour Organisations (NRC) Ltd. and Mine Labour Organisations (Wenela) Ltd. respectively. Although separate, they were run by the same board of directors and had the same management.
Among them was Mahatma Ghandi, a Communist agitator and troublemaker. Like the Chinese coolies, they were not returned to their country of origin once their contracts expired. They, too, went on to create a massive social program, and their descendants became lawyers who spearheaded the drive to infiltrate the government on behalf of the African National Congress.
British colonial capitalism has always been the mainstay of the oligarchical feudal system of privilege in England and remains so to the present day. When the poor, untutored pastoral people in South Africa who became known as the Boers fell into the bloodstained hands of the British aristocracy in 1899, they had no idea that the revoltingly cruel war so relentlessly pursued by Queen Victoria, was financed by the incredible amounts of money which came from the “instant fortunes” of the BEIC (British East India Corporation) ‘s opium trade in China into the pockets of the plutocrats.
Committee of 300 members Cecil John Rhodes, Barney Barnato and Alfred Beit instigated and engineered the war. Rhodes was the principle agent for the Rothschilds, whose banks were awash in cash flowing from the opium trade. These robbers, thieves and liars–Rhodes, Barnato, Oppenheimer, Joel and Beit–dispossessed the South African Boers of their birthright, the gold and diamonds that lay beneath their soil.
The South African Boers received nothing out of the BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS of dollars derived from the sale of THEIR gold and diamonds. The Committee of 300 quickly took full control of these vast treasures, control which it even now maintains through one of its members, Sir Harry Oppenheimer.
The average South African receives $100 per annum per capita from the gold and diamond industry. The BILLIONS which flow out annually go to the bankers of the Committee of 300. It is one of the most foul and vile stories of greed, theft and the murder of a nation ever recorded in the annals of history.
How could the British Crown have succeeded in pulling off this stunning fraud of gigantic proportion?
To accomplish such a Herculean task requires skilled organizing with devoted agents-in-place to carry out the daily instructions passed down from the conspirators’ hierarchy. The first step was a press propaganda campaign portraying the Boers as uncivilized barbarians, only slightly human, who were denying British citizens the right to vote in the Boer Republic. Then, demands were made on Paul Kruger, leader of the Transvaal Republic, which of course could not be met.
After that, a series of incidents were staged to provoke the Boers into retaliation, but that didn’t work either.
Then came the infamous Jameson Raid where a certain Jameson led a party of several hundred armed men in an attack on the transvaal. War followed immediately thereafter.
Queen Victoria mounted the largest and best equipped army that the world had ever seen at that time ( 1898). Victoria thought he war would be over in two weeks, since the Boers had no standing army and no trained militia and would be no match for her 400,000 soldiers drawn from the ranks of Britain’s underclasses. The Boers never numbered more than 80,000 farmers and their sons–some were as young as fourteen– Rudyard Kipling ; also thought the war would be over in less than a week.
Instead, with rifle in one hand and the Bible in the other, the Boers held out for three years. “We went to South Africa think-ing the war would be over in a week,” said Kipling.
“Instead, the Boers taught us no end of a lesson.” That same “lesson” could be taught to the Committee of 300 today if we could but muster 10,000 leaders, good men and true to lead this nation in battle against the gargantuan monster threatening to devour everything our Constitution stands for.
After the genocide ended in 1902, the British Crown had to consolidate its grip on the unimaginable fortune of gold and diamonds that lay beneath the barren veldt of the Boer Republics of Transvaal and Orange Free State. This was done through the Round Table of the legend of King Arthur and his Knights.
The Round Table is strictly a British M16 intelligence operation established by the Committee of 300 which, together with the Rhodes Scholarship program, is a dagger in the heartland of America. The Round Table was established in South Africa by Cecil Rhodes and funded by the English Rothschild family. Its purpose was to train business leaders loyal to the British Crown who would secure the vast gold and diamond treasures for the British Crown. South Africans had their birthright stolen from them in a coup so massive and all pervading that it was apparent only a central unified command could have pulled it off. That unified command was the Committee of 300.
That this was accomplished is not in dispute. By the early 1930’s, the British Crown had a
stranglehold on the biggest supplies of gold and diamonds ever found in the world.
NOW THE COMMITTEE OF 300 HAD AT ITS DISPOSAL BOTH THE VAST FORTUNE COMING FROM THE DRUG TRADE; – AND THE EQUALLY VAST FORTUNE OF THE MINERAL AND METAL WEALTH OF SOUTH AFRICA.
Financial control of the world was complete.
The Round Table played a pivotal role in the coup. The express purpose of the Round Table, after swallowing up South Africa, was to blunt the benefits to the United States of the American War of Independence, and once more bring the United States under British control.
Organizing ability was essential for such an enterprise and it was provided by Lord Alfred Milner, protège of the London Rothschild family.
Using Scottish Rite Freemason principles in selecting members of Round Table, chose chosen underwent a period of intense training at Cambridge and Oxford Universities under the watchful eyes of John Ruskin, a self-confessed “old school communist,” and T. H. Green, an operative of M16.
It was Green, the son of a Christian evangelical cleric, who spawned Rhodes, Milner, John Wheeler Bennet, A. D. Lindsay, George Bernard Shaw and Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s finance minister. I pause here to remind readers that the Round Table is only ONE SECTOR of this vast and all-encompassing Committee of 300. Yet the Round Table itself consists of a maze of companies, institutions, banks and educational establishments, which in itself would take qualified insurance actuaries a year to sort out.
Round Tablers fanned out throughout the world to take control of fiscal and monetary policies and political leadership in all countries where they operated.
Where crimes committed against whites are viewed by the communist racist black government, as simply ‘crimificent! Actions”
Now the parliament of Slummifica are being turned into ‘The crimificent ANC”
In essence, the law in South Africa functions only to protect the criminals, murderers and torturers of the white people. The police force is a mere reactionary force, arriving at them murder and torture scenes of whites, only AFTER they were killed.
The constitutional law that allows the existence of the police force clearly states, that their function should be the prevention of crime.
Under this constitutional law, the current SAPS in South Africa, does not have any right of existence, due to their inability to uphold the law, and prevent crime, including the genocide of Afrikaners.
The SAPS are the mere thugs and ‘enforcers’ of the criminal and communist ANC government. In essence the police force protects the criminals and their ‘government’ against the entry of the white population into this one-sided war that is being waged against the white population and their posessions.
The problem of the white population is the fact that they are ‘law’ abiding, albeit one cannot talk of a ‘law’ or ‘justice’ in South Africa for the white population.
Matt Damion recently read an author’s publication, which is also applicable to Afrikaners in South Africa:
The rule of law has regularized and maximized injustice.
In all the nations of the world; the rule of law is the darling of the rulers and the plague of the people.
We ought to recognize this, and it ought to transcend the national boundaries in our thinking.
The leaders of the world are comrades in arms, and smile when they get together.
We have the right to pursue life, liberty, work, the use of our God given talents to take care of ourselves, and our futures and the futures of those that are dear to us, and to resist those who undermine the right to life, liberty, happiness, work and caring for ourselves.
We have to go outside the law. Stop obeying the law.
Stop putting people in jail for small crimes, and keep others out of jail for enormous crimes.
This is the mindset the Afrikaners need to acquire, to be able to survive the current pogrom and genocide being waged against them by the mob rule of illiterate and plundering Africans.
Liberals, marxists and atheists all deny facts regarding the murderous nature of the African population.
All their opinions are preceded by contempt and hatred for any facts, reasoning, statistics, web-pages and photographic proof of the genocide being waged against the white population.
Especially for them that ignore history, facts presented to them in a normal way, I have created a special set of messages, that might help to enlighten them, inform them, and give them clarity regarding the prevailing situation of whites in South Africa
These are the messages for the visually challenged amongst the liberals; atheïsts, communists, illiterates, pagans and all Africans silently and de-jurically supporting the genocide of whites, and the destruction and plundering of South Africa, whilst knowing full well: you should not be stealing the country, nor the fruit from another’s labor:
Hopefully the falsified perceptions and history surrounding the land-issue and the Boer or Afrikaner in South Africa, is now viewed with a bit of clarity by their opponents and arch-enemies.
Human Rights Watch says political prisoners are commonly abused by government of President Islam Karimov.
Torture of political prisoners is widespread in Uzbekistan, a Central Asian country courted by the West as a transit point for forces fighting in Afghanistan, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) says.
In a report entitled Until the Very End: Politically Motivated Imprisonment in Uzbekistan published on Friday, HRW cited the cases of 34 prominent political prisoners as evidence that torture, kidnapping, incommunicado detention, solitary confinement and extension of sentences were all widespread. The watchdog group also added that local human rights bodies believed the number of political prisoners in Uzbekistan was in the thousands.
President Islam Karimov, 76, tolerates no dissent in the ex-Soviet state of 30 million people, which he has ruled since 1989.
HRW, whose Uzbek office was shut down in 2011, said its findings were based on more than 150 interviews with detainees’ relatives, former prisoners, human rights activists and a former prison official.
“Whether behind bars for 20 years or a shorter time, these people have been wrongfully imprisoned and shouldn’t spend even one more day behind bars,” said Steve Swerdlow, HRW’s Central Asia researcher and the former head of its Uzbek branch.
|People & Power: The Long Arm of the Dictator|
The report cited the case of Kayum Ortikov, a former employee of the British embassy in the capital Tashkent, who said he had been tortured for nine months in 2009 after being convicted on what he said were fabricated charges of human trafficking.
He said his torturers in the Tashkent city jail had burned his genitalia with flaming newspapers, pushed needles under his fingernails, and threatened to have allegedly HIV-positive prisoners rape him if he did not confess to being a spy.
After a public campaign by his wife, rights groups and British journalists, Ortikov was released in May 2011. He and his family fled Uzbekistan and finally resettled as refugees in the US this year.
Uzbek officials could not be reached or declined to comment, but Karimov has in the past said his tough methods were needed to keep Islamist militancy in check. Karimov’s relations with the West worsened when his troops notably crushed popular protests in 2005 in the eastern city of Andijan during which 187 people died according to the government and 700 according to rights groups.
With no political opposition to speak of and a state media that is highly supportive, Karimov looks likely to win a new term as president next March.
NDÉLÉ, Central African Republic — One day in September, Ahmed Adam, 23, sat on the ground in the regional capital, Ndélé, and rolled a cigarette. Adam was restless. Earlier that week he returned from the capital, Bangui, about 400 miles away. He was happy to be home. But with no money or means to buy what he needed to restart his life, he said, he was waiting for the U.N.-run demobilization program to begin, when he hoped to collect some cash. “If it works, I’ll be a farmer and work in the fields,” Adam said. “But if it doesn’t work, I’ll return to fight.”
Adam had been fighting since 2010, he said, when he joined the Convention of Patriots for Justice and Peace (CPJP), a northern rebel group that sought to overthrow the government of François Bozizé since 2008. Adam fought, he said, for the rights of the people in the north. But it was also to avenge a personal insult that he suffered at the hands of Bozizé’s police.
The CPJP believed that Bozizé, an ethnic Gbaya, was corrupt and that he failed to uphold promises to make his government more inclusive of other regions and ethnic groups. In 2012 a faction of the CPJP, along with other rebel groups, foreign mercenaries and local volunteers came together to form the Séléka, which means “alliance” in Sango, the national language. Most but not all the fighters were Muslim like Adam. The movement often recruited impoverished, uneducated men, and Ndélé quickly became a stronghold. The Séléka gathered strength as they went south, and on March 24, 2013, they succeeded in overthrowing Bozizé and installing their own president, Michel Djotodia.
The Séléka’s nine-month hold on power was cataclysmic. Djotodia proved unable to control his ranks of rebels. They raped women, plundered villages and killed hundreds, perhaps thousands of people whom they associated with Bozizé. In the south, nearly everyone was affected in some way. When asked if he ever killed innocent citizens or committed the abuses that so many spoke of, Adam laughed uncomfortably and asked if it was possible to fight and not kill. “But I only killed other soldiers,” he said.
By mid-2013, a mostly Christian group of fighters known as the anti-Balaka, which translates to either “anti-machete” or “anti-bullets,” emerged in rural villages to fight back. The movement was, in part, truly revolutionary: a self-organized militia of young men armed with rudimentary weapons like machetes and homemade rifles. But the anti-Balaka also counted among their ranks former army officers, many of whom remained loyal to Bozizé.
War in the Central African Republic is usually understood abroad as a grinding religious conflict. Of the 4.5 million people who live in the remote, landlocked country, only 15 percent are Muslim; the rest are either Christian or animist. These communities have lived together peacefully for centuries. The latest explosion of violence, though, has succeeded in pitting them against each other. Victims on both sides have suffered, but the minority Muslim population appears to have borne the brunt of it. Two years ago, there were nearly 700,000 Muslims in the country. Now, according to some counts, fewer than 90,000 remain.
Like many wars around the world that are perceived as religious in nature, and where the narrative of communal strife is used by warring sides to fuel hatred, the sectarian aspect of the conflict may be a result of the fertile soil it grew from. A legacy of weak state institutions, the failure of multiple governments to implement promised reforms, competition over natural resources and the unadorned political opportunism of militia leaders gave rise to the fighting and fed it. Religion coils around these dynamics, increasing the pressure.
Militia leaders on both sides use the narrative of religious war to mobilize fighters in the pursuit of their narrow political objectives, said Beni Youkaté, a Guinean man who works in the country as an informal mediator between Séléka and anti-Balaka groups.
“The crisis here is not at all a religious crisis. It’s military, and it’s political. Quite simply, people have their interests in the crisis, and this suits them to use this ideology, this idea that Muslims and Christians can’t get along,” Youkaté said.
The emergence of the anti-Balaka marked a turning point for the country. Many of the fighters conflated the CAR’s entire Muslim population with the Séléka. Soon they adopted a new goal: rid the country of its entire Muslim population. The Séléka, in turn, launched revenge attacks on non-Muslim populations, in particular against Bozizé’s Gbaya. For the first time, the conflict took on a sectarian dimension. At the U.N. headquarters in New York, diplomats spoke of the possibility of genocide.
Photoessay: Trapped in a Nightmare
Photographer William Daniels documents the plight of 23,000 refugees trapped by violence in the Central African town of Boda
The anti-Balaka attacked Bangui on Dec. 5, 2013, setting in motion weeks of tit-for-tat attacks between the two communities. Hundreds of bodies piled up in the city’s morgues and mosques. More than 100,000 of Bangui’s Christians fled to the city’s derelict airport, which was protected by French troops, and to other camps. Nearly the entire population of Muslims in the west, including many in the capital, fled north or across the border in “an exodus of historic proportions,” according to Amnesty International.
In September 2013, Djotodia attempted to disband some of the Séléka, and Adam, along with thousands of other fighters, was disarmed and forcefully billeted into a crowded, run-down military camp in Bangui. The plan was to integrate them into a new, professionalized army, but it never happened, and he languished there for months. “They just gave us some food, barely enough manioc”— a staple food, like a potato, that is eaten throughout Africa — “for the entire week and occasionally some sardines,” he said. “Life was really hard.”